I’m sorry but Barbie is either a pathological liar or a nut

October 31, 2008

On the radio today (a conservative radio show no doubt) Barbie went on her usual rant.

Palin told WMAL-AM that her criticism of Obama’s associations, like those with 1960s radical Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, should not be considered negative attacks. Rather, for reporters or columnists to suggest that it is going negative may constitute an attack that threatens a candidate’s free speech rights under the Constitution, Palin said.

This position would have a small ground of impact if:

  1. The information was not so dated and already aired, dealt with and moved on from so long ago, and
  2. the fact that Barbie has her own questionable ties with secessionist, religious nuts and an abuse of power being cited against her.  She also has several other investigations taking place in Alaska (more ethnic abuses with bilking the state out of money for traveling expenses, spending money on fixing up her mansion and not paying taxes, just to name a few of her own personal offenses).

Now here comes her moment of incoherent madness.  A time where she barely makes sense in a way that the structure of her words could be defined as having a real logical purpose.

If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations,” Palin told host Chris Plante, “then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.”

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Palin: Media threatening my First Ame…“, posted with vodpod

Let’s just say WTF?  The future of the first amendment to ask questions…but getting attacks by mainstream media.  Should, at this point, we surmise Barbie is such a pathological liar she has no real understanding that when you lie repeatedly someone in the media might call you on it? Or did she think, from that vacuum of a brain, that every one would believed that Obama was a terrorist based off her word solely, minus any real fact?  (Let’s not forget Bill Ayers was a participated of that group which was funded by Republicans — who sought his participation.)

Maybe fundamentally she does believe there is two Americas.  The one she likes where people mostly wear their bias, ignorance and hostility in the open versus the other America where people believe we are one nation and one America and refuse to be divided based off of intolerance.

Enough said.


One comment

  1. Oh Boy! I sure hope the MSM picks up on this, like her secessionists ties. I wrote my own post about this. Good Job!


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: